Mohd. Shamim v. State of U.P. and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a writ petition for want of prosecution as no one appeared to press it. Any interim order was vacated.
The High Court dismissed a writ petition for want of prosecution as no one appeared to press it. Any interim order was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 38721 of 2010
Petitioner :- Mohd. Shamim Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Shahabuddin,Shibli Naseem Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,D.P. Singh
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. Hon'ble Vikas Budhwar,J.
List has been revised. No one has appeared to press the petition.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 9.9.2022 GS
(Vikas Budhwar, J.) (Siddhartha Varma, J.)
Digitally signed by GAUTAM SONI Date: 2022.09.12 10:24:08 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohd. Shamim
State Of U.P.
Siddhartha Varma
Vikas Budhwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court