Petitioner filed a writ petition. Counsel stated the dispute was settled, rendering the petition infructuous. Court dismissed the writ petition.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous due to settlement between parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 3
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 34411 of 2021
Petitioner :- Sandeep Kumar Singh Respondent :- State Of U P And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Komal Mehrotra,Rajesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Amrish Sahai
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
Heard Sri Komal Mehrotra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Amrish Sahai, learned counsel for the respondent/Bank.
Both the learned counsel for the parties jointly state that the settlement between the petitioner and the respondents has taken place and, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed , accordingly.
Order Date :- 26.4.2022 sfa/
Digitally signed by SYED FAHEEM AHMAD Date: 2022.04.27 17:00:29 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Sandeep Kumar Singh
State Of U P
Other
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
Jayant Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
