Vinod Panjiyar v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Street vendor writ petition disposed without entering merits; direction to respondent No.3 to decide petitioner's representation expeditiously. Key terms: Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act 2014, section 22, section 22(d); Uttar Pradesh vendors within the area of an Industrial Development Authority (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Rules 2018, rules 4 and 5; town vending committee; criminal antecedents; Street Vendor Association permission and recommendation; reservation for petitioner; representation pending with respondent No.3; bench of Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker and Ajai Tyagi, JJ.; order dated 6.1.2022; counsel Sudhir Mehrotra and Navin Kumar for petitioner, C.S.C. and Kaushalendra Nath Singh for respondents.
What did the court decide?
Direction to respondent No.3 to decide the petitioner's representation as expeditiously as possible; no adjudication on merits.