The High Court allowed the petitioner's withdrawal application in a writ petition and dismissed the petition as withdrawn upon confirmation of possession.
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn; the application for withdrawal was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 21
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 18979 of 2021
Petitioner :- Mohammad Atif Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Muqeem Ahmad Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pawan Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
Civil Misc. Withdrawal Application No. 3 of 2022
The petitioner has filed an application praying for withdrawal of the petition. It is supported by his affidavit in which it is stated that the possession of the allotted house has already been handed over to the petitioner and he does not want to press the writ petition.
Shri Muqeem Ahmad, learned counsel for the petitioner is present. He has pressed the application.
The application is allowed.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order Date :- 12.10.2022 A. V. Singh
(Jayant Banerji, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.)
Digitally signed by AJAY VIKRAM SINGH Date: 2022.10.12 16:36:13 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohammad Atif
State Of U.P.
3 Others
Manoj Kumar Gupta
Jayant Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
