Not applicable. A one-line order dismissing a writ petition for lack of appearance and vacating the interim order does not rest on a general legal proposition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 70
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 17515 of 2022
Petitioner :- Smt. Shivanshi Sharma And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
This Court, vide order dated 29.07.2022, granted further time to the learned counsel for the petitioners for taking steps with a direction that in case steps are not taken, the interim order granted earlier shall automatically stand vacated.
As per the Office report dated 02.09.2022, the learned counsel for the petitioners has not taken any steps.
Today, when the case was called out, no one appears for the petitioners to press this writ petition.
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed under Chapter XII, Rule 4 of the Rules of the Court.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Let this order be communicated to the respondent nos. 2 & 3 by the Registrar (Compliance) within 48 hours.
Order Date :- 21.10.2022 Amit Mishra
Digitally signed by AMIT KUMAR MISHRA Date: 2022.10.21 15:31:38 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Shivanshi Sharma And Another
State Of U.P.
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
