The High Court declined interference in a writ petition regarding an order against which an appeal was available, disposing the matter with a direction for expeditious hearing of the appeal.
Petition disposed; petitioner directed to file appeal within two weeks for expeditious hearing on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 38
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16006 of 2022
Petitioner :- Rajeev Tripathi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramesh Chandra Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Kumar Gupta
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Order Date :- 4.7.2022 Prakhar
Digitally signed by PRAKHAR SRIVASTAVA Date: 2022.07.05 12:04:03 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajeev Tripathi
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
