Dinesh Kumar and Ors. Vs the State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. and Ors.

Court No. - 20

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 14678 of 2018

Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar And Ors. Respondent :- The State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Sunendra Kumar,K.S. Rastogi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Yogendra Nath Yadav

¶4

Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.

¶5

The present writ petition has been preferred by the petitioners for quashing the order datted 25.01.2018 passed by the Tehsildar, Tehsil Mitauli, District Kheri under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.

¶6

Learned State Counsel and Sri Dilip Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the Gram Sabha have submitted that the present writ petition is not maintainable as the petitioners have an efficacious statutory remedy under Section 67(5) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 to challenge the order passed under Section 67(1) hence, the present writ petition is liable to be dismissed on the said ground.

¶7

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners may be permitted to not press this writ petition and the same be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a case under Section 67(5) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.

¶8

Considering the request made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed and the petitioners are at liberty to avail the remedy as available under law.

¶9

Order Date :- 16.12.2022 Saurabh

¶10

Digitally signed by SAURABH VERMA Date: 2022.12.16 17:17:15 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Dinesh Kumar and Ors. v. the State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dinesh Kumar and Ors. v. the State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Laxman Janki Temple Vs Asstt. Commissioner J Lko. Division Lko. and Other

Surya Nath Yadav Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Food and Civil Supply Lko. and 3 Others

Prabhudeen Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Food and Civil Supplies U.P. Civil Secrett. Lko. and 4 Others

Smt. Maimuna Khatoon Vs State of U.P.Thru.Secy.Deptt.of Food and Civil Supplies and Ors.

Neelkanth Surgical Industries Private Limited Lucknow Vs National Company Law Tribunal Allahabad Thru.Registrar and Anr.

I.C.a.R.-National Bureau of Fish Genetic Res. Thru. Director Vs U.O.I. Thru. Secretary Labour and Employment New Delhi and Ors.