Writ petition challenging demand notices issued by a bank was dismissed, with the court directing the petitioner to approach the bank for remedy.
Writ petition dismissed; leave to appear before the bank granted to the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 13171 of 2022
Petitioner :- Tanveer Tabassum Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sanjai Singh
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
Sri Sanjai Singh learned Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent no. 3-bank.
The challenge is to the demand notices dated 23.3.2021 and 24.5.2021 issued by respondent-bank. There is no recovery against the petitioner.
The remedy before the petitioner is to approach the bank.
The writ petition is dismissed at this stage.
Order Date :- 2.11.2022 Brijesh
Digitally signed by BRIJESH KUMAR Date: 2022.11.03 10:07:43 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition maintaining challenge to demand notices disclosed without recovery should be entertained.
Tanveer Tabassum
State Of U.P.
Respondent-3 (Bank)
Sunita Agarwal
Vipin Chandra Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
