Writ petition dismissed for default under Allahabad High Court Rules after non-compliance with a prior order dated 7.7.2021. No counsel appeared for petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 70
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 12822 of 2021
Petitioner :- Smt. Tamanna And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajiv Sisodia,Dhirendra Kumar Srivastava,Mohd. Naushad Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
The writ petition is listed under Chapter XII, Rule 4 of Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952.
In view of office report dated 5.8.2021, the steps have not been taken in pursuance of the order dated 7.7.2021.
Case is called out. None appears on behalf of the petitioners.
The writ petition is dismissed as per Chapter XII, Rule 4 of Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This order shall be communicated to respondent nos. 2 and 3 by the Registrar (Compliance) within 48 hours.
Order Date :- 19.10.2022 Rahul Dwivedi/-
Digitally signed by RAHUL DWIVEDI Date: 2022.10.20 11:13:04 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Tamanna
State Of U.P.
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
