Dismissed
Urmila Devi v. State of U P and 11 Others
Allahabad HCWRIB/2488/2021
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous due to efflux of time by the Court.
What the court decided
AI extract
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous due to efflux of time by the Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 72
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 2488 of 2021
Petitioner :- Urmila Devi Respondent :- State Of U P And 11 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Hari Shanker,Sunil Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Prem Prakash
Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.
Heard Sri Sunil Kumar Singh, learned counsel for petitioner and learned standing counsel for State-respondents through video conferencing.
Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that by efflux of time, this petition has become infructuous, therefore, it may be dismissed as having become infructuous.
Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 21.1.2022 Sartaj
Urmila Devi
State Of U P
Neeraj Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court