Allowed

Bhagwan Das v. Deputy Director of Consolidation and 6 Others

Allahabad HC2 Mar 2022WRIB/105/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Allahabad disposed of a writ petition to expedite the decision on a Transfer Application under Section 65 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act. The court directed the respondent to decide the pending matter within three months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the District Deputy Director of Consolidation to decide the Transfer Application within three months, arbitrariness having been avoided, and opportunity given to parties.

Bhagwan Das Vs Deputy Director of Consolidation and… — Service and Employment | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 18

¶2

Case :- WRIT - B No. - 105 of 2022

¶3

Petitioner :- Bhagwan Das

¶4

Respondent :- Deputy Director Of Consolidation And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Subhash Chandra Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.

¶6

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to carry out necessary amendment in the petition during the course of the day.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned Standing Counsel accepted notice on behalf of respondent No.1.

¶8

In view of the order proposed to be passed, notices need not go to the respondent Nos.2 to 7.

¶9

The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition with the prayer to issue a mandamus directing the respondent No.1/District Deputy Director of Consolidation, Prayagraj to decide the Transfer Application No.NIL of 2020 (Bhagwan Shri Sahkari Avas Samiti Limited Vs. Ram Murat and others) under Section 65 of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act expeditiously.

¶10

It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the matter is pending since long and considerable time has already been lost but till date no final decision has been taken and prays for expeditious disposal

¶11

Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the prayer made by petitioner.

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the parties present. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties present, the present writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage itself.

¶13

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the respondent No.1/District Deputy Director of Consolidation, Prayagraj to consider and decide the aforesaid Transfer Application in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order but certainly after giving opportunity to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties, if there is no legal impediment.

¶14

Order Date :- 2.3.2022 saqlain

¶15

Digitally signed by SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER Date: 2022.03.04 17:04:23 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Bhagwan Das v. Deputy Director of Consolidation and 6 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhagwan Das v. Deputy Director of Consolidation and 6 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hari Lal and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Brijesh Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Gujiya Vs Additional Commissioner and 2 Others

Matsya Jivi Sahkari Samiti Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Chhedi Lal Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Smt. Raj Kumari Vs State of U P and 19 Others