Petitioner, a retired assistant teacher, challenged orders denying pension. This court quashed the impugned orders referring to Nand Lal, allowing the petition.
Impugned orders dated 05.03.2020 and 04.06.2020 were quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 36
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8844 of 2020
Petitioner :- Raj Pal Singh Chauhan Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- P.C. Mishra,Deepesh Kumar Ojha,Dharmendra Kumar Pandey
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Order Date :- 3.11.2022 Abhilash
Digitally signed by ABHILASH SINGH Date: 2022.11.03 16:34:45 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Nand Lal Vs. State of U.P.Referred¶7
Writ - A No. 12070 of 2022 (Nand Lal Vs. State of U.P. & Ors.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Raj Pal Singh Chauhan
State Of U.P.
3 Others
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
