Sapna Maurya v. University Grants Commission and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought mandamus for extension of Ph.D. thesis submission. Respondent certified extension until 30.6.2022. Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
Petitioner sought mandamus for extension of Ph.D. thesis submission. Respondent certified extension until 30.6.2022. Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5256 of 2022
Petitioner :- Sapna Maurya Respondent :- University Grants Commission And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashish Dwivedi,Kshitij Shailendra Counsel for Respondent :- Rijwan Ali Akhtar
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Short counter afÏdavit filed by Shri Kshitij Shailendra, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 and 3 is taken on record.
This petition was filed praying for issue of mandamus to the respondents to provide extension of time for submitting the Ph.D. thesis.
Shri Kshitij Shailendra , learned counsel for the University has filed short counter afÏdavit wherein it has been stated that period of submissions of Ph.D. Thesis has been extend upto 30.6.2022.
In view of the above, no order is required to be passed in the petition.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 25.4.2022 Atul kr. sri.
Digitally signed by ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Date: 2022.04.25 16:20:13 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Sapna Maurya
University Grants Commission
Others
Siddharth, J.
Atul Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court