There is no substantive content other than an order by the Allahabad High Court to dismiss the writ petition, directing reference to a previous order in WP (A) No. 481 of 2021.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 81
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 486 of 2021
Petitioner :- Yogesh Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Anand Prakash Pandey,Prabhakar Awasthi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Archana Singh
Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
The writ petition is dismissed .
For order, see our order of date passed in WRIT- A No.- 481 of 2021 (Arsiya Bano vs. State of U.P. and 3 Ors.).
Order Date :- 25.7.2022 Jitendra/-
Digitally signed by JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV Date: 2022.07.26 12:49:35 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Arsiya Bano vs. State of U.P.Referred¶6
WRIT - A No.- 481 of 2021 (Arsiya Bano vs. State of U.P. and 3 Ors.)
Yogesh Kumar
State Of U.P.
Manju Rani Chauhan
Jitendra Kumar Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
