Petitioner sought PIL regarding unpaid post-retiritual dues of late husband. Court noted respondent granted time to explain delay. Counsel stated dues were paid. Petition dismissed as infructuous.
The petition is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3543 of 2022
Petitioner :- Niharika Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Premshankar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
By the order dated 24.03.2022, the respondents is granted two week's time to file counter affidavit explaining why post retiral dues of late husband of the petitioner has not been paid to the petitioner till date.
Counsel for the petitioner, Sri Premshankar Shukla, has made statement that the aforesaid retiral dues have been paid to the petitioner.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 12.4.2022 Rohit
Digitally signed by ROHIT DAS Date: 2022.04.12 13:27:46 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Niharika Devi
State Of U.P.
3 Others
Siddharta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
