The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous due to the efflux of time since nobody appeared to press the case.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 79
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 35186 of 2010
Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajvendra Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anand K Sinha,K.M. Sahai,V.P.Mathur
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
The instant writ petition is listed under the heading of cases "likely to be infructuous".
Nobody is present to press the writ petition even in the revised call. It appears that the writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 20.7.2022 AKT
Digitally signed by ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI Date: 2022.07.21 11:31:31 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Sanjay Kumar
State Of U.P.
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
