Petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the withdrawal of his conditional appointment. The High Court held no defect existed in the Committee's order and disposed of the petition.
The writ petition stands disposed of with no further interference warranted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 36
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 20473 of 2022
Petitioner :- Gaurav Sharma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramesh Pundir,Shyam Sunder Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Parmatma Nand Ojha
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Order Date :- 8.12.2022 Abhilash
Digitally signed by ABHILASH SINGH Date: 2022.12.08 17:42:34 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the withdrawal of the petitioner's conditional appointment due to lack of typing skills constitutes a defect warranting writ interference.
Gaurav Sharma
State of U.P.
3 Others
Saumitra Dayal Singh, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
