This judgment dismisses a writ petition challenging a termination order dated 15.05.1991. The Court held the claim was wholly stale and the petition barred by laches due to a lapse of 31 years and the petitioner's earlier approach to the Court.
The writ petition was dismissed; no order as to cost.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 36
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 17930 of 2022
Petitioner :- Adesh Kumar Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amrendra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Order Date :- 9.11.2022 Abhilash
Digitally signed by ABHILASH SINGH Date: 2022.11.10 13:32:25 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the present writ petition challenging a termination order from 1991 is barred by laches after a lapse of 31 years.
Whether the claim raised by the petitioner is stale given that the petitioner had approached the Court earlier.
Adesh Kumar Pandey
State Of U.P.
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
