The PIL seeking addressing of a grievance was dismissed as withdrawn by the Chief Justice's Court with liberty for the petitioner to avail other remedies. No substantive legal question was decided.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail any other appropriate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chief Justice's Court Serial No.10
**HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD *****
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 95 of 2022
Lallu Singh
.....Petitioner
Through :- Mr. Akash Kishan, Advocate
v/s
State of U.P. and others .....Respondents
Through :- Mr. A.P. Paul, State Law Officer for the respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail of any other appropriate remedy for raising the grievance made in the present petition.
The petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(Prakash Padia, J.) (Rajesh Bindal, C.J.)
Allahabad 03.02.2022 Kuldeep/Rakesh
Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
Lallu Singh
State of U.P.
Rajesh Bindal
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
