The Allahabad High Court disposed of a PIL alleging illegal construction over state land, directing petitioners to approach authorities under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, as an effective alternative remedy existed.
None; petitioners directed to avail alternative remedy under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chief Justice's Court Serial No. 12
**HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD *****
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 663 of 2022
Dilip Kumar Dubey and others .....Petitioners
Through :- Mr. Shailesh Pandey, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Animesh Srivastava, Advocate
v/s
State of U.P. and others .....Respondents
Through :- Mr. Tej Bhanu Pandey, Standing Counsel for respondents no. 1 to 3
CORAM : HON'BLE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
(Piyush Agrawal, J.) (Rajesh Bindal, C.J.)
Allahabad
21.04.2022 Manish Himwan//P.Sri.
Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No√ Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
Digitally signed by MANISH HIMWAN Date: 2022.04.22 15:30:06 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners have exhausted alternative remedies before approaching this court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dilip Kumar Dubey
State of U.P.
others
Rajesh Bindal
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
