The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the present public interest litigation petition with liberty to file a fresh one. The High Court allowed the withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh petition giving better particulars.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chief Justice's Court Serial No. 3
**HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD *****
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 165 of 2022
Kalpnath .....Petitioner Through :- Mr. Gyanendra Prakash Srivastava, Advocate
.....Petitioner
v/s
Union of India and others
.....Respondents
Through :- Mr. Jagdish Pathak, Standing Counsel
CORAM : HON'BLE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh one for the same relief giving better particulars.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
(Piyush Agrawal, J.) (Rajesh Bindal, C.J.)
Allahabad 14.02.2022
P.Sri./Manish Himwan
Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
Kalpnath
Union of India and others
Rajesh Bindal
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
