Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant is wife of opposite party and residing at Meerut alongwith child aged about four years (now aged about seven years). He further submitted that opposite party has filed Divorce Petition No. 425 of 2017 (Praveen Kumar Vs. Smt. Neelam), under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Saharanpur, which is around 129 kilometers away from District Meerut, therefore, it is very difÏcult for the applicant to attend the Court proceedings at District Saharanpur on each date fixed and defend effectively. He next submitted that three cases being Case No. 12 of 2015, under Section 125 Cr.P.C., Complaint Case No. 2657 of 2015, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 452, 420, 120-B, 147, 148, 406 I.P.C. and Complaint Case No. 4727/9 of 2015, under Sections 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 of Domestic Violence Act are also pending in District Meerut. He next submitted that Apex Court as well as many other Courts have taken constant view that in such cases convenience of the wife has to be taken into consideration. In support of his contention, he has placed reliance upon the judgment of Apex Court, Punjab and Haryana High Court, Madras High Court and this Court in the cases of Sumita Singh Vs. Kumar Sanjay reported in 2001 LawSuit(SC) 363, Sweety Vs. Anuj Garg passed in T.A. No. 228 of 2014 decided on 11 August, 2015 and D. Kokila Vs. R. Dillibabu passed
