CSCR No. 294 of 2017 was dismissed for want of prosecution as the revisionists were not responding and had no instructions to argue the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 59
Case :- S.C.C. REVISION No. - 294 of 2017 Revisionist :- M/S Laxmi Narain Laxman Prasad And 2 Others Opposite Party :- Smt. Manju Singh And 9 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Ashish Agrawal Counsel for Opposite Party :- Bhanu Bhushan Jauhari
Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
Sri Nitesh Garg, Advocate holding brief of Sri Ashish Agrawal, learned counsel for the revisionists states that his client is not responding and he has no instructions from his clients to argue the case.
In view of above, the S.C.C. Revision is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This order has been passed in the presence of Sri Bhanu Bhushan Jauhari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of opposite parties.
Order Date :- 1.9.2022 sailesh
Digitally signed by SAILESH PRAJAPATI Date: 2022.09.01 15:27:20 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S Laxmi Narain Laxman Prasad And 2 Others
Smt. Manju Singh And 9 Others
Vipin Chandra Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
