Pitam Singh v. Nathu Singh and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The second appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the appellant despite notice. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
The second appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the appellant despite notice. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 781 of 1981
Appellant :- Pitam Singh Respondent :- Nathu Singh And Another Counsel for Respondent :- N.S. Singhal
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J.
Despite notice, no one has appeared on behalf of the appellant.
The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 1.11.2022 GS
(Siddhartha Varma, J.)
Digitally signed by GAUTAM SONI Date: 2022.11.02 10:10:09 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Pitam Singh
Nathu Singh
Another
Siddhartha Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court