Habeas corpus writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as petitioners failed to appear in Court No. 89 and press the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 79 of 2021
Petitioner :- Balram And 56 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Chandra Shekhar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
Case called out in the revised list. None appears on behalf of petitioners.
Heard learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
As nobody appears to press this Petition on behalf of petitioners, this Habeas Corpus Writ Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 18.4.2022 A. Mandhani
Digitally signed by ABHISHEK MANDHANI Date: 2022.04.20 10:41:11 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Balram And 56 Others
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
Anil Kumar Ojha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
