Habeas Corpus Writ Petition dismissed as it became infructuous after counsel informed the court. No substantive legal determination was made.
Habeas Corpus Writ Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 74 of 2019
Petitioner :- Viswa Pratap And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prem Bahadur Singh,Pavan Kishore,Rajesh Kumar
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Surendra Nath Tripathi
Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
Case called out in the revised list.
Heard learned counsel for the respondent, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
Learned counsel for the petitioners informed that this petition has become infructuous.
In view of the above, this Habeas Corpus Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 4.3.2022 A. Mandhani
Digitally signed by ABHISHEK MANDHANI Date: 2022.03.04 16:42:06 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Viswa Pratap And Another
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
Anil Kumar Ojha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
