Court dismissed Habeas Corpus Writ Petition as infructuous due to efflux of time. No hearing held on behalf of petitioners.
Petition dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 10120 of 2013
Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar And Another Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Acharya Rajesh Tripathi,Rakesh Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
List revised.
Heard learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
None appears on behalf of petitioners.
It appears that this Habeas Corpus Writ Petition has become infructuous due to efflux of time.
Accordingly, this Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 22.2.2022 A. Mandhani
Digitally signed by ABHISHEK MANDHANI Date: 2022.02.22 14:50:25 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajesh Kumar And Another
State of U.P.
Anil Kumar Ojha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
