The High Court abated this appeal against the second respondent, Sukram, due to his death, noting a prior abatement against the first respondent, Atar Singh, based on the government office report.
Abatement of appeal against Sukram; appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 46
Case :- GOVERNMENT APPEAL No. - 292 of 1986
Appellant :- State of U.P. Respondent :- Atar Singh Counsel for Appellant :- A.G.A. Counsel for Respondent :- S.P.S.Raghav,Ranjit Shome
Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma,J.
From perusal of the office report dated 22.08.2022 it transpires that information has been received from the CJM, Meerut that respondent no.2, Sukram has died.
This appeal has already been ordered to be abated against respondent no.1, Atar Singh.
Accordingly, this appeal is abated against respondent no.2, Sukram and is dismissed as such.
Order Date :- 1.9.2022 Shahroz
Digitally signed by SHAHROJ ALAM Date: 2022.09.02 14:44:38 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
State of U.P.
Atar Singh
Sukram
Anjani Kumar Mishra
Umesh Chandra Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
