No one appeared for the appellant, leading to the dismissal of the appeal in default. The interim order, if any, has been vacated by the court.
The appeal is dismissed in default. The interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- FIRST APPEAL No. - 919 of 1990
Appellant :- Aligarh Vikas Pradhikaran Respondent :- Ganga Saran And Others Counsel for Appellant :- H.P. Gupta,Pranjal Mehrotra,R. Upadhyaya,S.N. Upadhyay,Satyam Singh,Shiv Nath Singh Counsel for Respondent :- ,Ayub Khan,Brijendra Kumar,Devendra Dahna,Hemant Sharma,Naveen Yadav,Verendra Dahma
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.
List has been revised.
No one appears for the appellant.
The appeal is dismissed in default.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 28.4.2022 Satyam
Digitally signed by SATYAM AGRAHARI Date: 2022.04.28 13:48:11 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Aligarh Vikas Pradhikaran
Ganga Saran And Others
Salil Kumar Rai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
