Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant's counsel was absent and failed to press the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 44
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 625 of 1992
Appellant :- Naresh Kumar Garg And Another Respondent :- Delhi Transport Corporetion Counsel for Appellant :- A.N. Bhargava
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
The present appeal is of the year 1992. It is stated by the Office that First Appeal From Order Nos.590 of 1990, 591 of 1991 and 624 of 1992 are under search.
No one is present on behalf of the appellants to press this appeal. The Court has no option but to dismiss the appeal.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 20.7.2022 Vivek Kr.
Digitally signed by VIVEK KUMAR Date: 2022.07.25 17:00:03 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Naresh Kumar Garg And Another
Delhi Transport Corporation
Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
