S. Ahmad v. Smt. Tahida Begam
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal from Order No. 226 of 1997 (Court No. 44) was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the appellant's absence on the hearing date.
What the court decided
Court No. - 44
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 226 of 1997
Appellant :- S. Ahmad Respondent :- Smt. Tahida Begam Counsel for Appellant :- Vijay Prakash
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
None present for the appellant.
Hence, appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Order Date :- 23.9.2022 PS
Digitally signed by POOJA SHARMA Date: 2022.09.24 12:53:00 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- appellant
S. Ahmad
- respondent
Smt. Tahida Begam
Coram
Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- FAFO/226/1997
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court