Appellant faced dismissal of the appeal for lack of prosecution due to non-appearance in Court No. 2 without representation. The bench held 'we have not other option but to dismiss'; all arbitrators present.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 2204 of 2003
Appellant :- Km. Renu And Others Respondent :- Sri Jagdish Saran And Others Counsel for Appellant :- Pramod K. Sinha
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J. Hon'ble Ajai Tyagi,J.
Case is called out in the revised.
None is present on behalf of the appellants.
We have not other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.
The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 23.5.2022 Ashutosh Pandey
Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH PANDEY Date: 2022.05.24 10:14:30 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Km. Renu And Others
Sri Jagdish Saran And Others
Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
Ajai Tyagi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
