The criminal revision filed by Mohammad Nafis was dismissed for want of prosecution as the revisionist failed to appear. An existing interim order was vacated.
The criminal revision is dismissed for want of prosecution and interim order is vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 93
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 123 of 2009
Revisionist :- Mohammad Nafis Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Revisionist :- N.K. Trivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,S.R. Verma
Hon'ble Surendra Singh-I,J.
List has been revised. No one appears for the revisionist to press this criminal revision. Learned AGA appears for the respondents.
The criminal revision is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Order Date :- 15.11.2022 Pratima
Digitally signed by PRATIMA AGRAHARI Date: 2022.11.15 17:32:54 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
State of U.P.
Surendra Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
