In a Criminal Revision challenging a Criminal Appeal allowing the State against a Juvenile Justice Board order declaring the accused a minor, the High Court upheld the appellate decision. The Court found the assessment of age and evidence cogent, noting the revisionist had subsequently been acquitted in the main trial.
The Criminal Revision was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 91
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 119 of 2008
Revisionist :- Dinesh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Parshuram Chaturvedi,Mahindra Nath Pandey,Rajeev Kr.Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma,J.
Order Date :- 21.12.2022 Vik/-
Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere in the Criminal Revision challenging the appellate court's decision to set aside the Juvenile Justice Board order declaring the accused a minor.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Dinesh
State of U.P.
Jyotsna Sharma
Vikram Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
