Criminal Revision dismissed. The High Court found no error of law, fact, or evidence in the Additional Sessions Judge's acquittal of accused under Sections 498-A IPC and 304-B IPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 12
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 72 of 2008
Revisionist :- Ram Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.And 3 Ors. Counsel for Revisionist :- M.P. Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Atul Verma
Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.
Order Date :- 27.5.2022 MVS/-
Digitally signed by MANOJ VIKRAM SINGH CHAUHAN Date: 2022.05.27 18:46:47 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the revisional court should interfere in a Sessions Court acquittal under Sections 498-A IPC and 304-B IPC.
Whether any error of law, fact or evidence is apparent on record from the trial court judgment.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ram Singh
State Of U.P.
Dinesh Kumar Singh
Manoj Vikram Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
