Revision filed by the complainant (petitioner) to enhance the sentence awarded to an accused convicted under Sections 377 and 354 IPC. The High Court found no error of law, fact, or evidence requiring interference and dismissed the revision.
Revision dismissed as there is no error of law, fact or evidence requiring interference.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 10
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 444 of 2007
Revisionist :- Habib Ahmad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.And Anothers. Counsel for Revisionist :- Manoj Kumar Mishra,Ran Vijay Yadav
Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt.Advocate
Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.
Order Date :- 11.8.2022 MVS/-
Digitally signed by MANOJ VIKRAM SINGH CHAUHAN Date: 2022.08.16 18:42:16 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the sentence passed in the impugned order calling for enhancement requires interference under revisional jurisdiction under Section 397 CrPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Habib Ahmad
State Of U.P.
Dinesh Kumar Singh
Manoj Vikram Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
