Revision dismissed by the Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench). The court found no error of law, fact, or evidence in the Sessions Judge's judgment convicting Gangwar for murder and other offenses while acquitting co-accused. Application under Cr.P.C. 397, 401 rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 12
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 39 of 2008
Revisionist :- Bindra Prasad Pandey Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Ors. Counsel for Revisionist :- S.C. Tewari Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.
Order Date :- 18.5.2022 AKS
Digitally signed by ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA Date: 2022.05.19 17:03:29 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned judgment of the trial court finding the accused Gangwar guilty and acquitting Mohd. Shakir Ali and Manoj Yadav warrants interference.
Whether the trial court committed any error of law, fact or evidence in exercise of its powers under section 397 readwith section 401 Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bindra Prasad Pandey
State Of U.P.
Dinesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
