This court disposed of a criminal revision filed challenging the rejection of a maintenance application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. by the Family Court, Jhansi. The revisionist did not appear. Finding no manifest error, illegality, or procedural irregularity, the court dismissed the revision and vacated any interim orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2340 of 2004
Revisionist :- Smt. Anjana Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- Pushpa Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
Order Date :- 29.9.2022 Nirmal Sinha
Digitally signed by NIRMAL SINHA Date: 2022.09.30 13:57:38 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Family Court erred in rejecting the maintenance application filed under Section 125 Cr.P.C.
Whether a criminal revision is maintainable to set aside the judgment of the lower court in maintenance matters.
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Anjana
State of U.P.
Nirmal Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
