In Crim. Rev. No. 2258 of 2022, the revisionist abandoned the appeal due to a prior rejection of an application under Section 319 Cr.P.C., resulting in dismissal as not pressed.
Criminal revision dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 87
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2258 of 2022
Revisionist :- Sudhanshu Bhatnagar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Sushil Kumar Tewari,Braham Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Om Prakash Tripathi,J.
Sri Sushil Kumar Tewari, learned counsel for the revisionist wants to not press the present revision as the application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. has been rejected by the Trial Court and it may be dismissed as not pressed.
Accordingly, this criminal revision is dismissed as not pressed.
Order Date :- 19.7.2022 Priya
Digitally signed by PRIYA KUSHWAHA Date: 2022.07.19 16:21:47 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Om Prakash Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
