Held that the criminal revision regarding bail becomes infructuous as the detained juvenile has been released after completing the three-year observation home period.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 91
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2056 of 2020
Revisionist :- Vickky (Minor) Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Mahendra Pratap,Akhilesh Kumar Dwivedi,Anurag Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma,J.
Heard Sri Akhilesh Kumar Dwivedi, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri O.P. Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent no.1.
Compliance affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State from which it is revealed that the criminal case arising out of this matter i.e. case crime no.188 of 2019, under Section 307 I.P.C. stands decided by judgment and order dated 26.08.2022. Copy of the order passed by the J.J.Board is annexed as Annexure-1 to the compliance affidavit. It is revealed that juvenile was ordered to be detained in observation home for three years.
It is submitted on behalf of the revisionist that period of three years detention has already completed. Now he has been released. Therefore, he does not wish to press this criminal revision filed for grant of bail.
In view of the above, this criminal revision is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 6.12.2022 Asha
Digitally signed by ASHA Date: 2022.12.07 11:56:27 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
State of U.P.
Jyotsna Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
