This Criminal Revision under Sections 397/401 CrPC was filed against an acquittal by the trial Court. The revisional Court found no error of law, fact or evidence necessitating interference and dismissed the revision.
the criminal revision is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 10
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 197 of 2005
Revisionist :- Madik Manik Lal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.And 6 Ors. Counsel for Revisionist :- Sushil Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt.Advocate,Pawan Kumar Tiwari,Rudra Mani Shukla
Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.
Order Date :- 21.7.2022 MVS/-
Digitally signed by MANOJ VIKRAM SINGH CHAUHAN Date: 2022.07.22 18:57:51 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the lower Court's judgment acquitting accused respondents involved any error of law, fact or evidence requiring revisional interference.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
State Of U.P.
Sudama Tiwari and 5 others
Dinesh Kumar Singh
Manoj Vikram Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
