This is a criminal revision against an order of acquittal. No representative for the revisionist appeared. The High Court dismissed the revision citing efflux of time and lack of demonstrated illegality.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 93
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1402 of 2001
Revisionist :- Akhilesh Kumar Pandey Opposite Party :- Ram Kishor Pandey And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Krishna Murari,Prabhakar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt.Advocate
Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.
List has been revised.
None has appeared on behalf of the revisionist(s) to press this revision.
Sri Vaibhav Anand, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
This revision is directed against the order of acquittal.
Learned AGA submits that the present revision is of the year 2001 and it appears that due to efflux of time the revisionist and his counsel have lost interest to pursue this matter, and there appears no illegality or infirmity in the impugned judgment and order(s) passed by the court(s) below, therefore, the present revision may be dismissed.
I have gone through the judgment and order(s) passed by the court(s) below and have also considered the arguments advanced by the learned AGA. Further no one appeared on behalf of revisionist to assist the Court pointing out any illegality or infirmity in the judgment and order(s) passed by the court(s) below.
In view of the above, after having gone through the judgment and order(s) under challenge, this Court comes to the conclusion that the same need no interference as there is no illegality or infirmity in the judgment and order(s) under challenge, and further there appears force in the argument of the learned AGA that due to efflux of time the revisionist and his counsel have lost interest in pursuing the matter, therefore, the present revision is liable to be dismissed.
Accordingly, the present revision is dismissed.
Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned District and Sessions Judge for its onward transmission to the concerned Magistrate for compliance who will proceed further in the matter.
The file is consigned to record.
Lower court record, if any, be returned back to the concerned Court.
Order Date :- 16.3.2022 SA
Digitally signed by SALMAN ALI Date: 2022.03.21 10:01:42 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Akhilesh Kumar Pandey
Ram Kishor Pandey And Others
Shamim Ahmed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
