The High Court dismissed the Criminal Revision filed by Bhudeo Singh challenging the acquittal of respondents by the Sessions Judge. No arguments were presented by the revisionist.
The Criminal Revision was dismissed with a direction to transmit copies to lower courts for compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 93
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 117 of 1994
Revisionist :- Bhudeo Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- Veer Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- A.G.A.
Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.
List has been revised. No one has appeared on behalf of the revisionist. Shri Sanjay Kumar Singh, the learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
This revision has been filed challenging the order dated 14.10.1993 passed by Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Bijnor in Session Trial No. 491 of 1991, acquitting the respondents No. 2 to 6 from the charges framed against them under Section 149, 148, 149, 307, 506, 323, 324 I.P.C.
Shri Sanjay Kumar Singh submits that the present revision is of the year, 1994 and it appears that due to efflux of time the revisionist and his counsel have lost interest to pursue this matter, and there appears no illegality or infirmity in the impugned judgment and order passed by the trial court, therefore, the present revision may be dismissed.
I have gone through the impugned order passed by the trial court and also perused the record. I have also considered the arguments advanced by the learned A.G.A. Further no one appeared on behalf of revisionist to assist the Court pointing out any illegality or infirmity in the impugned order passed by the trial court.
In view of the above, after having gone through the order under challenge, this Court comes to the conclusion that same needs no interference as there is no illegality or infirmity in the order under challenge, and further there appears force in the argument of the learned A.G.A. that due to efflux of time the revisionist and his counsel have lost interest in pursuing the matter, therefore, the present revision is liable to be dismissed.
Accordingly, the present revision is dismissed.
Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned District and Sessions Judge for its onwards transmission to the concerned Magistrate for compliance who will proceed further in the matter.
Let the lower court record, if any, be returned back to the court concerned.
The file is consigned to record.
Order Date :- 24.2.2022 Mustaqeem.
Digitally signed by MOHD MUSTAQEEM KHAN Date: 2022.03.04 11:53:59 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present Criminal Revision filed challenging the acquittal order by the trial court allows any interference.
Shamim Ahmed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
