Single judge allowed criminal revision challenging Allahabad High Court order granting maintenance under Section 125 CrPC. Raised threat of Reserve Evidence Act repeal, noted order was per incuriam.
Modified order of Allahabad High Court to state it did not consider threat of Reserve Evidence Act repeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 83
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1046 of 2022
Revisionist :- Sarika Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Krishna Nand Rai,Vijay Anand Rai Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Virendra Singh
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
fuxjkuhdrkZ dh vksj ls ;g nkf.Md fuxjkuh] okn la0 120 lu 2019] lkfjdk flag olsZl mRd"kZ flag] vUrxZr /kkjk 125 na0iz0la0 esa iz/kku U;k;k/kh’k] ifjokj U;k;ky;] okjk.klh }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 21&12&2021 ds fo:) nk;j dh x;h gSA
fuxjkuhdrkZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk] foi{kh la0 2 ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA
fuxjkuhdrkZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd fo}ku voj U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr iz’uxr vkns’k fn0 21&12&2021 }kjk ;g vo/kkfjr fd;k x;k gS fd “;fn iRuh viuk Hkj.k iks"k.k djus esa l{ke ugha gS rks og vius ifr ls Hkj.k iks"k.k izkIr dj ldrh gSA orZeku ekeys esa mijksDr ifjfLFkfr;ksa ds vUrxZr fo’ks"kdj rc tc izkfFkZuh ds [kkrs esa dbZ ckj ,d yk[k ls mij dh /kujkf’k tek gks] ;g ugha dk tk ldrk fd og viuk Hkj.k iks"k.k djus esa l{ke ugha gSA izkfFkZuh dh rjQ ls ;g rdZ vo’; fn;k x;k fd mlds [kkrs esa tek /kujkf’k mlds fj’rsnkjksa vFkok mlds firk }kjk tek dh x;h gS] ysfdu bl rF; ds leFkZu esa fj’rsnkjksa o firk ds [kkrs dk dksbZ Hkh LVsVesUV nkf[ky ugha fd;k x;k gS” fuxjkuhdrkZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd fuxjkuhdrkZ ds [kkrs esa ;fn mlds firk vFkok fj’rsnkj dksbZ /kujkf’k tek dj nsrs gSa rks bldk vFkZ ;g ugha yxk;k tkuk pkfg, fd ml /kujkf’k dks og vius en esa [kpZ djus dks Lora= gS] cfYd ;gkW ij voj U;k;ky; dks ;g ns[kuk pkfg, fd mldh Lo;a dh ekfld vk; fdruh gS vkSj bl ckjs esa foi{kh dh vksj ls dksbZ izek.k ugha izLrqr fd;k x;k vkSj u gh voj U;k;ky; }kjk bl rF; ij dksbZ fopkj fd;k x;k gS] cfYd voj U;k;ky; }kjk dsoy Hkj.k iks"k.k dj ldus esa l{ke gksus ds fy, izrhr gksus okyh vk; dks ekuk x;k gS ] bl izdkj fo}ku voj U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr iz’uxr vkns’k nks"kiw.kZ gS ,oa fujLr fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA
fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us muds rdksZ dk izcy fojks/k fd;kA
eSaus fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa ds rdksZ ds ifjizs{; esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; ,oa iz’uxr vkns’kksa dk ifj’khyu fd;kA
ekeys ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa ds n`f"Vxr ;g nkf.Md fuxjkuh Lohdkj dh tkrh gS rFkk okn la0 120 lu 2019] lkfjdk flag olsZl mRd"kZ flag] vUrxZr /kkjk 125 na0iz0la0] iz/kku U;k;k/kh’k] ifjokj U;k;ky;] okjk.klh ds le{k bl funsZ’k ds lkFk izfrizsf"kr fd;k tkrk gS fd bl vkns’k esa mfYyf[kr fdlh Hkh fVIi.kh ds xq.k&nks"k ls izHkkfor gq, fcuk] i{kdkjksa dks lquokbZ dk leqfpr volj nsrs gq, ,oa i=koyh dk lE;d :is.k voyksdu djus ds mijkUr] vUrfje Hkj.k iks"k.k vkosnu i= dk iqu% fuLrkj.k 1 ekg ds vUnj fd;k tk;A
dk;kZy; dks funsZ'k fn;k tkrk gS fd bl vkns'k dh ,d izfrfyfi lacaf/kr fopkj.k U;k;ky; dks vfoyEc Hkstuk lqfuf'pr djsA fn0 % 5&8&2022 ds0lh0flag
Digitally signed by KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH Date: 2022.08.05 18:13:28 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Section 125 CrPC order granting monthly allowance to wife is maintainable even though she lives separate from husband and daughter without any actual dispute regarding their living arrangement
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sarika Singh
State of U.P.
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
