Shri Mohd. Alam v. State of U.P. and 6 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court held that the writ petition was rendered infructuous because a charge sheet had already been filed in the matter.
The High Court held that the writ petition was rendered infructuous because a charge sheet had already been filed in the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 47
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 846 of 2022
Petitioner :- Shri Mohd. Alam Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sarfaraz Ahmad Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
On the matter being called out, learned A.G.A. has pointed out that after investigation, a charge sheet has already been filed in the matter on 14.12.2021 being Charge Sheet No.361/2021.
The writ petition is, therefore, rendered infructuous and is dismissed, as such.
Order Date :- 9.2.2022 Meenu
Digitally signed by MEENU SINGH Date: 2022.02.09 13:51:08 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Shri Mohd. Alam
State Of U.P.
Anjani Kumar Mishra
Deepak Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court