The High Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous writ petition as infructuous due to the lapse of time, noting that no one appeared to press the matter and the cause no longer survives.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 48
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 643 of 2020
Petitioner :- Bhanmati Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kamlesh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Adya Prasad Tewari,Sheo Shankar Tripathi
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J. Hon'ble Syed Waiz Mian,J.
Case called out in the revised list. No one has put in appearance to press the petition.
It appears that the cause no longer survives by lapse of time.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed having become infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Learned A.G.A. to supply order to the authority concerned.
Order Date :- 19.9.2022 S.Prakash
Digitally signed by SHASHI PRAKASH Date: 2022.09.22 11:49:09 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhanmati
State Of U.P.
Other 1
Other 2
Other 3
Suneet Kumar
Syed Waiz Mian
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
