Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition rendered infructuous due to filing of charge sheet as stated by the Advocate General; dismissed without substantive determination.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 47
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 581 of 2022
Petitioner :- Nandan Singh And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Syed Fahim Ahmed,Surendra Kumar Yadav
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Manoj Kumar Dhuriya
Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. on behalf of State.
At the very outset, learned A.G.A. states that in this matter a charge sheet has already been filed on 15.12.2021 being Charge Sheet No.402 of 2021.
In view of the statement so made, it is clear that writ petition has been rendered infructuous and is dismissed , as such.
Order Date :- 3.2.2022
Meenu
Nandan Singh
State Of U.P.
Anjani Kumar Mishra
Deepak Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
