A criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR was disposed of as infructuous because a final report had already been filed by the State during the pendency of the petition.
Petition disposed as infructuous; pendency of petition has been terminated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chief Justice's Court Serial No.343
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
*******
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 417 of 2021
Bhola Kharwar and another .....Petitioners
v/s
State of U.P. and others .....Respondents
Through :- Mr. Syed Ali Murtaza, Additional Government Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 4
CORAM : HON'BLE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
"(a) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of CERTIORARI calling for the records and quashing the impugned first information report dated 7.11.2020 registered under Section 366, 120B IPC, Police Station- Dubhad, District- Ballia."
2 CRLP No. 417 of 2021
the pendency of the present writ petition.
(Piyush Agrawal, J.) (Rajesh Bindal, C.J.)
Allahabad 01.04.2022
Kuldeep
Whether the order is speaking : No Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
Digitally signed by KULDEEP SINGH Date: 2022.04.11 10:29:34 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Bhola Kharwar
another
State of U.P.
Rajesh Bindal
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
