A criminal miscellaneous writ petition was dismissed as the petitioner had an alternative statutory remedy and no party appeared to press the matter when called.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 44
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2635 of 2022
Petitioner :- Mukesh Babu Tripathi Respondent :- State Of U P And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gulab Chandra,Rupesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
The petitioner has remedy to invoke the jurisdiction of competent magistrate under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. Even otherwise none has appeared to press the petition, when the matter is called out in the revised list.
This petition is, accordingly, dismissed .
Order Date :- 14.3.2022 Haseen U.
Digitally signed by HASEENUDDIN Date: 2022.03.15 14:49:26 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Mukesh Babu Tripathi
State Of U P
3 Others
Ashwani Kumar Mishra
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
