The High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR under Section 366 IPC as infructuous due to the efflux of time, noting the matter may be revived via application if it survives.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18117 of 2018
Petitioner :- Gulshan Bajpai And Ors. Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru.Special Secy. Deptt.Of Home U.P.Lko. And Ors
Counsel for Petitioner :- Katyayan Mishra,Anuj Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- Govt.Advocate
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Mrs. Saroj Yadav,J.
This petition seeks issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned First Information Report/Case Crime No.286 of 2018, under Section 366 I.P.C., Police StationKotwali Bangarmau, District-Unnao.
It appears that by efflux of time, the instant writ petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous . Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
However, it is open for the petitioner(s) to move an appropriate application within two months from today, if the matter survives.
It is made clear that if any consequential proceedings are initiated in pursuance of the impugned F.I.R., the parties are at liberty to take recourse to law.
[Saroj Yadav, J.] [Ramesh Sinha, J.]
Order Date :- 7.3.2022 lakshman
Digitally signed by LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA Date: 2022.03.09 16:53:18 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Gulshan Bajpai
State Of U.P.
Ramesh Sinha
Saroj Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
